- Family Law Overview
- Personal Injury Overview
- Criminal Defense Overview
- Estate Administration
- Business Litigation
While it cannot be questioned that the probate court does possess the power to make an assignment of a spouse’s property regardless of the source, this issue is one of discretion, i.e., should the court exercise its admitted power. In Putnam v. Putnam, 5 Mass.App.Ct. 10 (1977), the Appeals Court noted the distinction regarding the court’s exercise of its power to assign property. At issue was the assignment of the net proceeds from the sale of the divorced parties’ Marital Home, held by them as tenants by the entirety. The wife contended that the judge’s apportionment of the proceeds, which effectively awarded one-third (1/3) of what otherwise would have been her share to the husband, was unjustified in that § 34 did not confer a power for equitable division on the Probate Courts. Id. at 13. The court found this contention patently false based on the most recent case law, but nevertheless found the appointment unjustified in that the probate judge’s report of material facts did not furnish an adequate basis for the assignment to the husband of a portion of the net proceeds. Id., 5 Mass.App.Ct. at 16.
The Court in Putnam noted that the power given the Probate Courts to assign property of the other spouse is not an unlimited and that “[a] decision awarding property of one spouse to the other will be sustained on appeal (only) if it is supported by traditional alimony considerations or by findings relative to the respective contributions of the parties in accordance with the fourth sentence in of § 34.” (emphasis added). The court also noted that an “order for equitable division should normally encompass all substantial assets jointly owned and any separate property representing accretion during the marriage and should be based on a comprehensive analysis of all major elements of contribution by the spouses during the marriage.” (emphasis added). Id., 5 Mass.App.Ct. at 17. This opinion clearly suggests that the court should not exercise its discretion to assign such property unless there exists an affirmative showing of “contribution”, either economic or non-economic, on the part of the respective parties in relation to the particular asset in question.
The Court’s analysis in Williams v. Massa, 431 Mass. 619, 728 N.E.2d 932 (2000) is highly relevant here. In Williams, the Appeals Court found that there is no question that the husband’s stocks and bonds that were gifts from his parents, and his interests in family trusts, inherited from his parents, comprised part of the marital estate for purposes of possible division under G.L. c. 208, § 34, and that the trial judge clearly knew the law on the point because she listed these assets in her findings as part of the marital estate. However, the trial judge’s statement, that she found “no special circumstances” which would justify an assignment to the wife of the husband’s inherited or gifted property, shows neither that she excluded those assets from the marital estate, nor that she imposed an improper test for the equitable division of those assets. The judge’s words merely indicate that, after her consideration of all the factors enumerated in § 34, including her assessment of the source of the inherited and gifted assets and the parties’ respective contributions to them, those assets should remain the property of the husband, especially in light of the judge’s finding that there were other jointly produced assets to assign to the wife.
Attorney John E. Studley, Jr. has over 30 years of legal experience and has represented clients in drafting and negotiating Antenuptial Agreements. If you would like to speak with him, please call Sandy at 508-946-0070.
© 2017 Studley Law Offices
"John Studley helped me thru a very difficult time in my life. He explained everything to me and made me feel independent in my decisions. He got me more than I expected. Thanks to You and your team." - Diane - December 9, 2016
"I completely agree with a prior reviewer...a complete class act! He is highly efficient, extremely knowledgeable, personable, totally professional, highly successful and very entertaining. I have dealt with Atty. Studley on a few matters over the course of 12 years and he (and his staff!) have consistently provided the time and means to successfully litigate my cases/issues. I was fortunate enough that he was referred to me and I have had absolutely no regrets. If you're looking for the best, he's the person to hire." - L - December 1, 2016
"Posted by Michelle September 16, 2015 John Studley is a true class act. I have been a client of his since 2008. He puts the needs of the child first and foremost. He is direct and honest with his clients in a compassionate manner. I would highly recommend Studley Law Offices. I have great faith in John, Sandy and the rest of the team and I remain truly greatful for all of their hard work." - Michelle - September 16, 2015
"Attorney Studley and his staff are exceptional! They all are very professional, courteous, efficient and empathetic for our case. Attorney Studley knew the "ins and outs" of the laws and was able to implement them in our case. He was always available to us in a timely manner. He explained various situations and avenues we needed to explore. He provided us with the information we needed to move forward in our case. Attorney Studley was always prepared for any situation in court. He even had copies of documents that the judge did not have available to him during court proceedings. We have already recommended him to a fellow grandparent and would do so again." - Bev - August 31, 2015
"John Studley is very professional. I would highly recommend him to anyone who needs a lawyer. He kept me informed by promptly responding to my emails and phone calls." - Roger - January 31, 2015
"John and his staff were very professional from the beginning. He is very persistent and thorough. My case took over a year to settle but his staff had to do a lot of research. They constantly kept me in the loop as to how the case was progressing. I would not hesitate to use his services again." - Ron - August 21, 2014
"John helped my family in a difficult child custody case. His excellent work was instrumental in saving my granddaughters from ongoing physical and mental abuse." - Tom - August 12, 2014
"This was my first experience dealing with a lawyer. I found John Studley to be very professional in dealing with my case. He explained everything to me in detail and his knowledge of the law reassured me that my case was justified. I had complete trust in him as he was confident and I would highly recommend him to any person in need a lawyer. John dealt with my personal injury case. He set up appointments with Doctors, Neurologists and Physical therapists for me. He and his team were very responsive in returning my phone calls and communicated all correspondence in this matter. He showed a compassion for my health and well being during a difficult time in my life. He was instrumental in facilitating a fair settlement in my case." - Brian - February 21, 2014
"John Studley has been my attorney for over 20 years and has never disappointed me. He is, in my opinion the best lawyer you could have. Rest assured that if you have Attorney Studley for your lawyer he will definitelyl do the best that he can do for you. He definitely is a cut above the rest..." - Edna - February 11, 2014